Pastor's Blog

-introduction-

In the coming months, I want to take some time to address in written form some of the contemporary issues that we’re facing, both inside and outside the church. My aim is to address them from a biblical point of view to the best of my ability. This is not in any way an attempt to “be political” or to politicize issues. Rather, it comes from a desire to see God’s people evaluate and establish their convictions from the pages of Scripture rather than the conflicted voices of media. That said, let me reaffirm our commitment to remain fixed on the center of our faith; namely, Jesus Christ crucified, risen and coming again. From this, we must never deviate as the center of our ministries. Yet, I’m also convinced that the Scripture does speak to the many issues that we’re facing in this unique season of history. In short, it’s the practice of the doctrine of Sola Scriptura – the Bible alone as our highest authority—to assess contemporary issues in light of what the Bible has to say. My simple encouragement to you is to test everything with Scripture—including what I write. May God grant us the grace to be harmless as doves and wise as serpents.


Sincerely,


~ Dan Deckard


  • covid & the "end of days" - by Dan Deckard

    Sadly enough, I don’t remember many sermons from my childhood—a humbling realization for a pastor who preaches sermons! But I do remember a few evening services in the 70’s in which our congregation gathered to watch a series of movies about the end times—the first of which was A Thief in the Night. I will never forget some of the images burned into my mind from that movie. By today’s standards, the cinematography was crude and primitive. At the time, however, it was riveting. I found the film frightening and exciting at the same time—exciting in the sense that it intensified my belief that the end was near. Decades later, the same “end times” theology would be repackaged in literary form in the popular series, Left Behind—fictional, yet built on a particular interpretive approach to the book of Revelation (and prophecy in general). I was taught the view, believed the view and shared the view with others. While there is neither time or space in this brief article to parse out the particulars of the view, it assumes that the events described in the book of Revelation—particularly, the events following chapter 4— are to be interpreted somewhat literally and in a linear fashion—a chronological road map of judgments poured out on the earth at the end of the age (a final 7 years to be exact).


    What I enjoyed about this approach to the Bible was the sense of anticipation and expectancy that it nurtured. I actually felt like the return of Jesus was near. As Christians, we should be filled with longing and anticipation for this grand reunion! What I disliked about the end-times fascination, was that it tended to incite more hype than holiness in the lives of those around me (including myself). Too, it tended to focus on the sequence of events prior to the end rather than the return of the Savior himself—who is the crowning joy of all Christian hope. And finally, it assumes that we can accurately identify how prophecy is being fulfilled in real-time as we move into the future. Back in the day, I distinctly remember Christians identifying Henry Kissinger (then, the Secretary of State), as a possible candidate for the position of false prophet…or possibly the anti-Christ! Of course, it never came to be. In retrospect, it strikes me as somewhat unkind toward the late Mr. Kissinger to label him as such.


    Why do I bring this up? Well…because 2020 has snowballed into an apocalyptic-type year—plagues, lawlessness, riots, violence, fires…all in a highly combustible election season. As such, the end-times voices are speaking again—calling out specific current events (e.g. the COVID pandemic) as fulfillments of specific, biblical prophecies of the end. I will admit that such interpretations generate “end times” excitement and perhaps fear (depending on where you come down on the rapture issue and its timing). But I have to ask if this fascination with identifying particular current events with particular prophecies is edifying to the church? Or, does it create false-excitement, unnecessary fear or even spiritual distraction? I believe so.


    While we should remain fixed in hope on the horizon of the future for the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, our primary focus should not be combing through contemporary events trying to decipher a prophetic map. And here’s why.


    First, Jesus explicitly taught us that no one knows when the end will come (Matthew 24:36). It will be a surprise. While we may have reasons to anticipate that the end is drawing near (e.g. 2 Thessalonians 2:3), God has a way of fulfilling his prophetic word that is often unexpected and surprising. Too, some prophecies indicate multiple fulfillments making any final identification somewhat problematic (Matthew 24:24, 1 John 2:18).


    Consider for a moment how unexpected and surprising the first coming of Jesus was. As Christians, we believe that Jesus was the central message of the Hebrew prophets (Luke 24:27). Yet, no one expected a couple from Nazareth, traveling to Bethlehem, to give birth to the messiah in a cave. Moreover, his entire ministry (again, the central subject of the Old Testament) was baffling to Jesus’ contemporaries. Jesus, quite literally, didn’t fit into their messianic box! Even John the Baptist, with his prophetic call, questioned whether Jesus was the one (Matt 11:3)—again, signifying the surprising way in which God fulfilled his prophetic word. Paul argues that even the rulers of this age couldn’t figure out how the Scripture would be fulfilled (1 Cor 2:8), otherwise they wouldn’t have crucified the Lord of glory.


    This teaches us something about prophecy and its fulfillment; namely, that fulfillment is largely discerned retrospectively (looking backward) as opposed to prospectively (looking forward). There is sufficient ambiguity in the prophetic word to require humble faith in God’s surprising and often unpredictable fulfillment; yet, sufficient clarity that when the fulfillment actually takes place, we look back and say, “Wow! How did I miss that? It’s so clear!” Paul speaks of the gospel of Christ as “the mystery that was kept secret for long ages but has now been disclosed…” (Romans 16:25-26). The very centerpiece of Scripture—Jesus and his work—was “the mystery” proclaimed by the Hebrew prophets of old. Yet, it wasn’t until later that it was “disclosed” through the apostles. Jesus was there all along in the Old Testament prophets, yet sufficiently hidden. This tells me that combing through current events in hopes of ferreting out prospective fulfillments is at best, speculative and at worst…a waste of time.


    The best we can say, as we experience apocalyptic-type events happening now, is a cautious, “Maybe.” What we can be sure of is that Jesus will, in fact, return. Of that, we may be confident. How we get there or by what sequence of events is far less important. Rather, Jesus’ parables about the end stress the importance of watchfulness, faithfulness, fruitfulness and love (see Matthew 25 in its entirety). Let’s major on these things. As we do, let us spur one another on to love and good works as we anticipate our great hope.


  • To Mask, or not to mask - by Dan Deckard

    First of all, let me say that in the paragraphs that follow, my main concern really isn’t about the masks per se. It’s more about the critical process of thinking through things biblically and discerning what Christian love looks like in times of discord. Personally, I don’t know of anyone who actually enjoys wearing a mask. I miss seeing smiles, hearing people speak with unmuffled voices and enjoying the richness of full facial expressions. Preaching to people wearing masks is like speaking to a group of faceless eyes made worse with sunglasses. (No offence intended, of course, you’re simply doing what you’ve been told.) Like many of you, I’ve seen and read the varied opinions on both sides of the great divide as to the effectiveness of masks to mitigate the disease. The internet is loaded with contrary medical opinions. Masks will often determine whether a person does or doesn’t attend worship—on both sides. Then, there are those who leave one church for another church with the preferred mask policy…suggesting that the commitment to the local church is only mask-deep. It all comes down to the mask—to wear, or not to wear.


    So, here’s how I’ve processed this with the Scripture. First, I have to go back to what the Bible does and doesn’t say. There is nowhere in Scripture that prescribes or prohibits the wearing of masks. Compare that to…say…singing in worship. Singing is commanded repeatedly in the worship gathering of God’s people. So…we sing. When the Persian government prohibited prayer in the days of the prophet Daniel, Daniel still got down on his knees and prayed (Dan 6:10) in violation of state orders. Why? Because the Bible commands prayers be offered to God. This is the first step—to differentiate between biblical and non-biblical directives. Where there is no explicit prescription or prohibition, then Romans 13:1-2 comes into play—we submit as best as possible to the authorities over us regardless of our personal beliefs on the matter. So…I wear the mask that I don’t really want to wear.


    Second, I have to consider the principle of love. Paul was no stranger to differences of opinion in the church—eating meat offered to idols, kosher versus non-kosher and keeping/not keeping the Jewish ritual calendar (Rom 14). For some people in Paul’s day, the issue was black and white. For others (like Paul), there was freedom in Christ (Rom 14:14). At the end of the day, Paul taught the principle of deferring to one another in love (Rom 14:15). For example, if I believe that I’m free to eat any kind of meat—like pork—and I invite a Jewish family over for dinner, I will intentionally choose a menu that is sensitive to the Jewish conscience. Translating this to our day, if I believe that masks are ineffective, yet I’m invited to a house where the family is extremely sensitive to the spread of COVID, then I will wear a mask or whatever I need to honor their conscientious beliefs on the matter. It’s an expression of humble love that considers the interests of others above my own (Phil 2:2). 


    Mind you, on the flip side, I don’t believe one person’s convictions on these debatable matters should be leveraged to coerce conformity to his/her view. That too, would be a violation of the others-focus that defines Christian love. Regardless of where one finds themselves on the great mask-divide, consideration for the interest of the other person is paramount.


    Third, the New Testament passionately contends for the unity of the church family (e.g. the first thing that Paul addresses in the troubled church in Corinth was not their faulty view of the resurrection, but their divisions—see 1 Corinthians 1:10-11). In the words of Paul, we must be “eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Eph 4:3). This commitment to practice Christian unity is actualized in the local church family (as it was for the church in Corinth). A failure to commit to the local church family because of a mask, is a failure to commit to the unity of the church family…straight and simple.


    Above all, we must remember that we are to love one another as Christ loved us. We, the church, are a diverse group—some would even say a motley crew—lovingly embraced by a gracious and patient God. If this is how God loves us, then let us strive to love one another in the same manner…regardless of our personal convictions about the wearing of masks. May God strengthen our resolve to love in these conflicted times.


  • defunding police - by Dan deckard

    One of the foundational beliefs of Christianity is the supreme authority of Scripture. There is no way of overstating just how important this singular doctrine is to the life and health of the believing church. Without the written Word, we have nothing. I think most people who take the time to read this will agree with me on this point. That said, if our doctrine of Scripture teaches that the Bible serves as our highest authority over all other authorities, then the practical function of this doctrine means the Bible, properly interpreted, serves as 1.) the ground of all true knowledge and 2.) the ultimate standard by which all assertions of reality are tested.


    I say this, because the question of defunding and (therefore) dismantling law enforcement is not outside the purview of Scripture. Instead of forging our views of the matter on the ever-changing winds of culture and its deeply imbedded (and hard to prove) social narratives, we need to return once again to our foundational truth—the Scripture. What does the Bible have to say about the validity of law enforcement?


    To answer that question, we need to begin with a deeper question…the anthropological question, what is humanity? Who are we as humans? What is our fundamental nature? If we answer that question correctly (from Scripture), then the rest of the question begins to fall into place. Indeed, the Scripture does teach us that we were created in the noble image of the invisible God—endowed with God-like virtues and capacities for good. But the Scripture is also clear that due to the intrusion of sin, the entirety of our human constitution has been corrupted—mind, body and desires (Eph 2:3). We are told by Moses that, “The LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually” (Gen 6:5). Again, Moses asserts, “the intention of man’s heart is evil from his youth” (Gen 8:21). The prophet Jeremiah reminds us forcefully that the human heart is “deceitful” and “desperately sick” (Jer 17:9). Jesus himself assumes that people are basically evil in his teaching ministry (Matt 7:11). Indeed, Paul speaks of a time when evil and lawlessness will culminate as we near the end (2 Thess 1:9-12). In short, the Scripture teaches that humanity is fundamentally corrupt. This doctrine does not mean that each person is as evil as he or she can be, only that the heart unchanged by grace is fundamentally controlled by human pride.


    This doctrine of human depravity applies in at least two ways to the question of law enforcement. First, it establishes the need for law enforcement (however it might be structured or funded in a society). In the days of Noah, human civilization devolved to a point where, “the earth was filled with violence” (Gen 6:11). The solution was a divinely executed “do-over” through a catastrophic deluge. Genesis 6 serves as a graphic reminder of the potential depths of social depravity. This explains why in the post-flood instructions, the first command of justice was given, “Whoever sheds the blood of a man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his image” (Gen 9:6). The means of civil justice (in this case, murder), is human agency, “by man shall his blood be shed….” This is human enforcement of justice. Without it, society devolves into inconceivable expressions of brutality and corruption. The last century witnessed the breakdown of law and order in a number of horrific genocides. The point? Without some means of enforcing justice, society becomes a monstrous and murderous place to live. Paul elaborates on this principle of enforcement further when he declares that, “there is no authority except from God, and…have been instituted by God” (Rom 13:1). And this institution of divine authority, “does not bear the sword in vain” (Rom 13:4). Perhaps it goes without saying, but the sword is the instrument of just enforcement.


    The point in all of this is to say that law enforcement is absolutely necessary per our doctrine of depravity and our doctrine of authority. Those who think we can function without it operate from a faulty premise; namely, that people are essentially good and simply need more education and better opportunities.


    Yet, there is a second application of this doctrine of depravity that we must not miss either. The simple fact that humans are fundamentally corrupt means that each and every one of our organizations and institutions is also subject to corruption. Sinfulness infects ecclesiastical organizations (aka churches), the Oval Office and…yes…law enforcement. Our doctrine of depravity applies to men and women wearing a uniform and a badge. Does our modern concept of racism infect the hearts of officers? From what I know about human depravity, sadly…yes. I’m sure that it does in some officers—as do the sinful impulses of lust, greed and favoritism. The answer, however, is not defunding or dismantling the very thing that restrains evil! That ends in anarchy. The answer is to discipline the guilty, not demolish the whole—to fix what’s broken, not throw it away. To do so is a classic example of throwing the baby out with the bath water.


    As a Christian, I embrace the absolute need for law enforcement AND the absolute necessity of careful, constant and vigilant accountability for those who serve in this office. Too, I should say that I’m encouraged by the biblical truth that there will come a day when law enforcement will be no more—when God makes “all things new.” Then, people will, “beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks…” (Isa 2:4). Lord come quickly!